M3 - Learner Manual

3. Manage responsibilities in relation to law reform

3.2. Parliamentary Law Reform

Parliamentary Committees[1]

One of the formal ways law reform can be undertaken is by making a submission to a parliamentary committee (the Commonwealth, states and territories all have similar processes).  The role of a parliamentary committee is to examine a legal issue and/or proposed law by holding public inquiries that receive written submissions and oral evidence from members of the public, organisations and experts.

 

What is a Parliamentary Committee?

A Parliamentary Committee is a group of Members of Parliament, appointed by the Parliament, to investigate policy issues, proposed legislation or government activities. The membership of these Committees tends to reflect the diverse political make-up of the House (Upper or Lower) from which they are drawn. The work of Parliament has become more complex. Members have to consider an increasing range of issues and legislation. At the same time more people in the community want to participate in the democratic process. Committees allow Parliamentarians to examine an issue in more detail and with greater public input than if either House as a whole considered the matter.

Parliamentary Committees provide an opportunity for individuals and groups to put their views directly to Parliamentarians. Members of the public can:

-       make submissions

-       give oral evidence

-       attend public hearings, and

-       obtain copies of reports.

 

Parliamentary Inquiries

In most cases, one of the Houses or a Minister refers inquiries to a Committee. The terms of reference define the scope of an inquiry and are determined by the House or the Minister responsible for referring the inquiry.

A committee will often start its inquiry by calling for submissions from the public and relevant organisations. The inquiry's terms of reference are usually advertised in the appropriate newspapers and are published on this Internet site. These should be followed by people making a submission. Anyone can make a submission but people or organisations with specialist knowledge or representative views may be invited to make a submission.

After the committee has examined all the submissions, witnesses may be invited to give oral evidence. This allows committee members to speak directly to people about matters relevant to an inquiry and seek clarification or further details about issues raised in a submission. Members of the public may observe these hearings, although sometimes they occur in private.

In addition to calling for submissions and taking evidence, committees may canvass public opinion on the issues raised by an inquiry in a number of other ways. These include seminars, conferences, study tours, workshops and round-table discussions.

 

Committee Reports

After considering all the submissions, evidence and its own research, the committee produces a report. This is tabled in the House that initiated the inquiry and includes the committee's findings and recommendations. The tabling of a report provides an opportunity for all members of the House to debate the findings. The committee's formal involvement in an issue effectively ends with the tabling of its report.

Committee reports are public documents and are widely distributed. A copy of a report or a summary is sent to everyone who made a submission, appeared as a witness, or requests a copy from the committee office. Committee reports are also available at the State Libraries and university libraries.

After a report is tabled, the Government must respond to the referring house within six months, outlining its recommendations for action. The Government is not obliged to implement the committee's recommendations but must explain why it has decided not to carry out some or all of them. A copy of the Government's response is sent to everybody who made a submission or gave evidence. Others can get a copy through the committee office or from this internet site.

 

Law reform impacting Aboriginal & Torres Strait Islander people[2]

The process of garnering support or preparing submissions for law and policy affecting Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people places additional focus on:

-       respect for Aboriginal & Torres Strait Islander culture when considering both consequences and reasons for reform;

-       extensive consultations with community to determine existing issues and what could be practicable options for reform;

-       community ownership of changes for the community, when possible;

-       recognising underlying social issues which may not be automatically ‘solved’ with a change in laws.

The Following table outlines a number of examples of contemporary law reform that have had a particular impact on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in Australia.

Date

Event

Issue

Broader Impact

1965

A group of University of Sydney students organised a bus tour of western and coastal New South Wales towns to draw attention to the racism- The Freedom Rides. Aboriginal student Charles Perkins was, by the end of the journey, a national figure in the fight for Aboriginal rights[3]

Racism

The publicity it gained raised consciousness of racial discrimination in Australia and strengthened future campaigns to eradicate it.

1966

Over 200 Gurindji stockmen and their families walk off Wave Hill cattle station in the Northern Territory. These men were initially protesting against poor living and working conditions. The Gurindji stockmen later demanded the return of their traditional lands from station owners. The nine year protest will be the first in Australia to attract significant public support for Indigenous land rights.

Land Rights

An Aboriginal Lands Trust is established to take ownership of Aboriginal reserves in South Australia under the Aboriginal Land Trusts Act

1966 (SA). This is the first piece of legislation to provide Indigenous people with communal rights and interests in land.

1967

The 1967 referendum was held to change the Australian Constitution. Two negative references to Aboriginal Australians were amended/removed (s.51 & s.127). This afforded the Commonwealth the power to legislate for Aboriginal people as a group and for Aboriginal people to be counted in the national census.

Entrenched racism in Australian Constitution

The 1967 referendum did not give Aboriginal people the right to vote. This right had been legislated for regarding Commonwealth elections in 1962.[4] The 1967 referendum was seen to be a major step toward equal treatment and respect for Aboriginal & Torres Strait Islander people across Australia.

1972

On Australia Day, a group of Aboriginal activists establish the Aboriginal Tent Embassy on the lawns of Parliament House in Canberra in protest against the McMahon Government’s rejection of land rights.

Land Rights

The embassy will become an important symbol of the ongoing Aboriginal land rights movement.

1975

The Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth) is passed by Federal Parliament, making it unlawful for the States and others to discriminate on the basis of race. An attempt by the Federal Government to give effect to Australia's obligations under the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD).[1]

 

Racism

This was a major move by the Federal government toward eradicating systemic racism in Australia. The Act, importantly, prevented the QLD Government from enacting Discriminatory legislation aimed at defeating Eddie Koiki Mabo’s legal claim over his traditional lands. It’s possible that without this legislation, Native Title may not exist today.

1989

The Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission (ATSIC) was established through the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission Act 1989, which took effect on 5 March 1990.

Self-governance

This was seen to be a progressive step in the struggle for the political, cultural, social & economic empowerment of Aboriginal & Torres Strait Islander people.

1991

A royal commission in 1987 investigated Aboriginal deaths in custody over a 10-year period, making over 330 recommendations.

Custodial Over-representation

Improved arrest conditions and procedures for managing Aboriginal & Torres Strait Islander detainees. The Royal Commission also shed light on the extent of over-representation of Aboriginal people in custodial facilities. The recommendations emphasised the need to address the many and varied socio-economic factors underlying this over-representation.

1992

In Mabo v Queensland (No 2), the High Court recognises native title as a common law property right, rejecting the doctrine of terra nullius. The High Court declares that, subject to any acts of extinguishment, the Meriam people are ‘entitled as against the whole world, to possession, occupation, use and enjoyment of the island of  Mer’, an exclusive possession form of native title

Land Rights

The Mabo decision provided Indigenous peoples with a viable legal doctrine to protect their interests and to facilitate the preservation and strengthening of their culture

 

1993

The Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) is passed by the Federal Parliament, establishing a process for the recognition of native title, national standards for future dealings affecting native title and permitting the validation of past official actions which had been attempted on native title land but breached the Racial Discrimination Act. The legislation follows lengthy debate and negotiations between Indigenous stakeholders, governments, pastoralists and the mining industry.

Land Rights

This Act allowed provided for the legislative recognition of the rights and interests of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in land under their traditional laws and customs.

2007

Little Children are Sacred Report was published as result of Inquiry into the protection of Aboriginal children from sexual abuse commissioned by the government of the Northern Territory. It makes 97 recommendations regarding alcohol restrictions, the provision of healthcare and many other issues relating to child abuse and neglect in regional Aboriginal communities.

Protection of Children

The report was not adopted fully but the Federal government responded with packaged changes to welfare provision, law enforcement, land tenure and other measure (NT Intervention)

2008

The Federal Government under Kevin Rudd, offered a broad apology to all Aboriginal & Torres Strait Islander people across Australia, especially those that were part of the stolen generations. The government apologised for the "profound grief, suffering and loss" caused by misguided laws and policies of successive governments.

Recognition of the historical mistreatment

of Aboriginal & Torres Strait Islander people

This apology was seen to provide for a broader national dialogue on the historical wrongs committed against Aboriginal & Torres Strait Islander people in Australia. It was hoped, that through greater recognition of the challenges faced by Aboriginal & Torres Strait Islander people, society would commit to substantive measures seeking positive change.

2009

The Australian Government endorses the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP)

Equality

Ratification of the UNDRIP, resulted in greater influence of international law on the course of Indigenous law and policy in Australia.



[1] United Nations Human Rights at http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CERD.aspx [accessed 14/01/2015].



[1] Parliament of Australia, (2014), ‘Infosheet 4- Committees’, < http://www.aph.gov.au/about_parliament/house_of_representatives/powers_practice_and_procedure/00_-_infosheets/infosheet_4_-_committees>, Accessed January 8 2015.

[2] Cox, E. (2014), The official criteria for effective funded programs for Indigenous people and communities. Why don’t they apply their own recommendations? How to make the programs fix the problems!’ 

[4] National Archives of Australia at http://www.naa.gov.au/collection/fact-sheets/fs150.aspx [accessed 14/01/2015].